Venue: BFEI | Room 108
Class: WDM
Topic: Leadership
Introduction:
Today we discussed "Leadership" we watched some videos resources on the mindset of leaders and we went through some powerpoints theories on the topic and finally we did an exercise with a partner for the content of our blog.
Just before we delve into the theories, principles etc, I will like to share a good quote on Leadership that came to mind while I was in the class, Martin Luther King Jr. once said and I quote:
“A genuine leader is not a searcher for consensus but a molder of consensus.” ― Martin Luther King, Jr.
Before the discussion on leadership, we watched a short TED video on "How great leaders inspire action" by Simon Sinek. In the video, Simon Sinek presents a simple but powerful model for how leaders inspire action, starting with a golden circle and the question "Why?" His examples include Apple, Martin Luther King, and the Wright brothers -- and as a counterpoint Tivo, which (until a recent court victory that tripled its stock price) appeared to be struggling.
You can watch the video here, if you wish (click to play)
The summary of the main points from Simon Sinek video are as follows:
"There are leaders and there are those who lead. Leaders have a position of power or authority. But those who lead, inspire us." He went on to say "whether they are individual or organisation we follow those who lead, not because we have to but because we want to" also "we follow those who lead not for them but for ourselves"
In his explanation of how great leaders inspires action, he used the story of "Apple" as a company that believes in challenging the status quo, by doing things differently and communicating differently compared to other companies and how by this simple means, inspire consumers to buy not as a result "Apple" being a better company structurally but only simply by using reverse communication that appeals to a part of our brain that controls "feelings and trust and loyalty" that part of our brain "responsible for all human behaviour and all of human decision making" yet this part of our brain has no capacity for language.
He also said "People don't buy what you do but buy why you do it" He believed that Great Leaders are those that communicate expressing what they believe not what they want to do or achieve, this explains why such leaders will always have followers "who believe what they believe". He went on to use Martin Luther King Jr. as an example of such leader with his "I have a dream" speech to inspires people of all colour who have the same dream,
Finally, he believe that "when we communicate inside out we are talking directly to the part of the brain that control behaviour and we allow people to rationalise it with the tangible thing we say and do". This effective method of communication is the only reason why these leaders (whether individual or organisation) are great because their communication style drives behaviour.
Class Content and My Reflection:
My own reading on the theories and examples of real life application of the principles:
My own reading on the theories and examples of real life application of the principles:
After the video we then discussed couple of notes on leadership, we went through 32 power-points slides. Though in the class, we didn't discuss the definition of leadership but I feel it is important to define leadership for a clear understanding of what was discussed in the power-point, because in the slides, we discussed various leadership styles relating to leadership in management, we also discussed types of leaderships and why there's a gap between men and women in leadership positions.
So What is Leadership?
In my personal research, according to Wikipedia,
and in theory leadership has been regarded as:Leadership is both a research area and a practical skill encompassing the ability of an individual or organization to "lead" or guide other individuals, teams, or entire organizations. Wikipedia
...the process of influencing others so that they understand and agree about what actions can be taken, how the actions can be executed effectively, and how to inspire individual and team efforts to accomplish shared objectives - (Kouzes & Postner, 2002).There are countless other definitions on leadership online, it is noted that researchers usually define leadership according to their individual perspectives and the aspects of the phenomenon of most interest to them. An Author actually concluded after a comprehensive review of the leadership literature, “there are almost as many definitions of leadership as there are persons who have attempted to define the concept.”
In this blog, I will not attempt to resolve the controversy over the most appropriate
definition of leadership. For the purposes of this study, I will stick with the above two definitions.
How we engaged with topic (class reaction, personal perspectives etc)
Developing our understanding of leadership we first examined:
Gender and Leadership: Internationally women are still under represented in positions of power, responsibility and leadership the following might have something to do with that.
- professional training
- different leadership style between men and women
- cultural values and
- economical reason
Reflection: Things are changing, it is noted that women are currently being promoted to positions of leadership faster than men. Effective leadership is not the exclusive domain of either gender and both can learn from the other.
Self-Managed Work Teams: though leadership is different from management, in our discussion on leadership, the next point was a strange one because it is a management issue, but I supposed the point was made to explain that “managers are people who do things right and leaders are people who do the right thing.”
Self-Managed Work Teams is actually a Leadership/Managerial Styles issue. Traditionally, teams are managed from the top down.A leader or manager might want his/her team members to participate more and share responsibilities.
In the discussion, our class teacher gave us an example how she was trusted by her previous boss and allowed to self managed her work, that might be because of her maturity and being skilled for a high level of involvement.
Reflection: Leaders who behave like this manage to blend concern for both people and organisation aims by using a collaborative teamwork approach, and plenty of consultation enabling the development of a shared (not imposed) motivation to achieving the organisation's goals.
In the discussion, our class teacher gave us an example how she was trusted by her previous boss and allowed to self managed her work, that might be because of her maturity and being skilled for a high level of involvement.
Reflection: Leaders who behave like this manage to blend concern for both people and organisation aims by using a collaborative teamwork approach, and plenty of consultation enabling the development of a shared (not imposed) motivation to achieving the organisation's goals.
So What is Self-Managed Work Teams?
In an online article written by Lynne MacDonald; "What Is a Self-Managed Team?" reviewed by Michelle Seidel, B.Sc., LL.B., MBA; Updated March 07, 2019,
"A self-managed team is a group of employees that's responsible and accountable for all or most aspects of producing a product or delivering a service. Traditional organizational structures assign tasks to employees depending on their specialist skills or the functional department within which they work"
This describes companies run by teams of people, who are given the necessary resources and then left to get on with it. This type of team will be more autonomous than typical groups. They are responsible for determining their own goals and processes.
Members participate in important decisions and share leadership responsibilities. Because of this, members tend to be more committed and engaged in the group.
Research also shows that in Ireland, eBay, Hewlette Packard, Bord na Mona, Galtee and Aughinish Alumina are using this SMWT. I also understand it is prevalent in the production, maintenance, customer service and support, distribution, quality and administrative activities in a significant proportion of Irish-based organisations.
Reaction: This style normally requires that followers/the group are suitably mature and skilled for a high level of involvement. This style will be difficult to use in some organisations and may be inadvisable when leading inexperienced people to produce challenging and vital results in a new or strange area.
Managing Tasks
Task management is a process where one identifies, monitors and progresses the work that needs to be done during the day.
This leadership style is task-oriented. One of the big challenges for leaders/managers is making sure that tasks are done by others.
Managing Relationships
Leaders focus on listening, building relationships, teamwork, inspiring, motivating and persuading the followers.
The Managerial Grid (Blake & Mouton)
The managerial grid model (1964) is a style leadership model developed by Robert R. Blake and Jane Mouton. This model originally identified five different leadership styles based on the concern for people and the concern for production.
Blake and Mouton depicted their model as a grid with two axes:
This managerial grid assumes that the most desirable style is a high concern for people and task.
This style combines a high concern for and involvement in the group with a strong well-organised and communicated focus on achieving the task. Blake and Mouton saw this as the ideal behavioural approach. Leaders who behave like this manage to blend concern for both people and organisational aims by using a collaborative teamwork approach, and plenty of consultation enabling the development of a shared (not imposed) motivation to achieving the organisation's goals.
Reflection: The approach has been criticized because it fails to take into account the needs of particular circumstances, and that the appropriateness of particular styles will vary from situation to situation.
Task management is a process where one identifies, monitors and progresses the work that needs to be done during the day.
This leadership style is task-oriented. One of the big challenges for leaders/managers is making sure that tasks are done by others.
- Initiating structure: a leader need to define leader and group member roles, initiates actions, organises group activities and defines how tasks are to be accomplished by the group.
- Setting standards and objectives: a leader need to set expectations and standards and then hold measurement against those objectives.
- Defining responsibilities and identifying roles: this means that before you even assign a task to a team member or group, always know where it fits in the grand scheme of things. Does the task need to be done in a specific order? Does it require a specific set of skills? Does the rest of the project rely on this one task’s completion? Knowing all these things about the task will give you a better sense of who to entrust it to.
- Establishing communication networks: no matter how large or small your team size is, successful task management hinges on good communication. Whether it means constantly updating and interacting with other team members, having daily progress reports, or simply checking in with each team member personally, communication is the only way you’ll get a true sense of what’s getting done.
- Coordinating activities: a good leader is able to coordinate various efforts of different departments and their different tasks and activities in harmony to achieve the organisation's objectives efficiently.
- Giving evaluative feedback: effective leaders have good listening and emotional awareness – they understand the impact that their behaviour has on others. Effective leader/manager should regularly give feedback to maximise their employees/followers potential at different stages of training, raise their awareness of strengths and areas for improvement, and identify actions to be taken to improve performance.
Managing Relationships
Leaders focus on listening, building relationships, teamwork, inspiring, motivating and persuading the followers.
- Boosting member morale
- Providing support and encouragement
- Building group cohesion
- Establishing networks of support
- Reducing and helping to resolve interpersonal conflict
The Managerial Grid (Blake & Mouton)
The managerial grid model (1964) is a style leadership model developed by Robert R. Blake and Jane Mouton. This model originally identified five different leadership styles based on the concern for people and the concern for production.
Blake and Mouton depicted their model as a grid with two axes:
- Concern for People
- Concern for Production or Task
- Leadership/Managerial Styles
- Country Club Style
- Impoverished Style
- Middle of the Road Style
- Produce-or-Perish Style
This managerial grid assumes that the most desirable style is a high concern for people and task.
This style combines a high concern for and involvement in the group with a strong well-organised and communicated focus on achieving the task. Blake and Mouton saw this as the ideal behavioural approach. Leaders who behave like this manage to blend concern for both people and organisational aims by using a collaborative teamwork approach, and plenty of consultation enabling the development of a shared (not imposed) motivation to achieving the organisation's goals.
Reflection: The approach has been criticized because it fails to take into account the needs of particular circumstances, and that the appropriateness of particular styles will vary from situation to situation.
Teamwork Exercise of the day (with a partner - Jasmine) and how we worked together on the exercise.
Exercise #8 Leadership
1 For the exercise, we formed a group of two, some others were in a group of three.
My partner in the group exercise was Jasmine. We were to pick one leader that we both admire most. The leader of our choice can be from a business / political / sport / religious background. In this case, we both decided to go for Martin Luther King Jr., a religious leader.
My partner in the group exercise was Jasmine. We were to pick one leader that we both admire most. The leader of our choice can be from a business / political / sport / religious background. In this case, we both decided to go for Martin Luther King Jr., a religious leader.
We were to summarize his qualities etc. We did a short presentation to the rest of the group in the class.
Our Team Leader of Choice
Below is screen grab of our discussion on his leadership qualities, you can find the full detail on our Padlet post.
Screenshot from Padlet
What did you learn from the topic?
1. I learnt that It’s not about what you you but why. A leader should know what he believe and why he believe what he believe otherwise there should be no reason why anyone should remain a loyal follower.
2. On leadership style, a good leader allow his followers to participate more and share responsibilities rather than manage or leader from top down.
3. Managers are people who do things right and leaders are people who do the right thing
4. A leader to be decisive, many people need decisions from you, and if you can’t make them quickly your organisation will suffer or followers will rebel.
5. Don’t agonize, over analyze or second-guess yourself. Many times, no decision is worse than a wrong decision because inaction paralyzes staff, prevents progress and destroys morale.
6. To be Inspirational especially when the going gets tough, people need to feel that everything is going to be OK. They inevitably look to their leaders for motivation and encouragement. Leaders need to project hope and positivity. Trust your talent, be bold and people will line up behind you.
7. I have learnt that to be a leader you also need to empathetic. Try to place yourself in the shoes of the other person. Having empathy is crucial to leaders, because you are going to be dealing with people management and communication.
8. A genuine leader need to be persuasive. Martin Luther King Jr. said, “A genuine leader is not a searcher for consensus but a molder of consensus.” Effective leaders aggressively sell their vision, and win over naysayers with substance and character. Remember, your job isn’t to please everyone -- it is to get the job done right, even if that ruffles some feathers. Celebrate positive results and have a concise message about why your path is the right one.
2. On leadership style, a good leader allow his followers to participate more and share responsibilities rather than manage or leader from top down.
3. Managers are people who do things right and leaders are people who do the right thing
4. A leader to be decisive, many people need decisions from you, and if you can’t make them quickly your organisation will suffer or followers will rebel.
5. Don’t agonize, over analyze or second-guess yourself. Many times, no decision is worse than a wrong decision because inaction paralyzes staff, prevents progress and destroys morale.
6. To be Inspirational especially when the going gets tough, people need to feel that everything is going to be OK. They inevitably look to their leaders for motivation and encouragement. Leaders need to project hope and positivity. Trust your talent, be bold and people will line up behind you.
7. I have learnt that to be a leader you also need to empathetic. Try to place yourself in the shoes of the other person. Having empathy is crucial to leaders, because you are going to be dealing with people management and communication.
8. A genuine leader need to be persuasive. Martin Luther King Jr. said, “A genuine leader is not a searcher for consensus but a molder of consensus.” Effective leaders aggressively sell their vision, and win over naysayers with substance and character. Remember, your job isn’t to please everyone -- it is to get the job done right, even if that ruffles some feathers. Celebrate positive results and have a concise message about why your path is the right one.































- Follow Us on Twitter!
- "Join Us on Facebook!
- RSS
Contact